In 
		2 Timothy 2:15, Paul advised Timothy to be diligent in presenting 
		himself approved before God. He emphasized the importance of working in 
		a way that avoids shame, specifically by rightly dividing and accurately 
		handling the word of truth. If we seek God's approval, it is essential 
		for us to interpret His word correctly.
			
			The 
		Bible warns us that it is possible to misinterpret the scriptures to the 
		extent that it leads to our own destruction. This suggests that we must 
		be extremely diligent when we engage with God’s word, whether during 
		preaching services or in our classes. Simply knowing the scriptures is 
		not sufficient; many people are familiar with the texts yet fail to 
		interpret them correctly. Consequently, this misinterpretation can lead 
		to detrimental outcomes. Therefore, we must exercise great care in our 
		study and understanding of the scriptures.
			
			A 
		prime example of this can be seen in the context of the Jews in the 1st 
		century. They possessed a wealth of evidence from the Law of Moses, 
		including hundreds of prophecies that trace back to Genesis 3 and extend 
		through to the conclusion of Malachi. Despite the abundance of these 
		prophecies predicting the arrival of the Messiah, the overwhelming 
		majority remained unbelieving.
			
			In 
		John 5:46, Jesus held the Jews accountable, stating, "For if you 
		believed Moses, you would believe me; for he wrote about me." He 
		emphasized that if they had truly read, understood, and believed what 
		Moses wrote about Him, they would have recognized Him as the Messiah. 
		This accountability extends to us as well; God expects us to engage with 
		His Word. On Judgment Day, we won't be able to stand before God and 
		claim ignorance of His desires for us. Our understanding is our 
		responsibility, and He has made His Word accessible and clear. As Paul 
		noted, he wrote to ensure that his knowledge was understandable, 
		emphasizing the importance of grasping these teachings.
			
			We 
		must remain diligent, which is why Paul instructed Timothy to do the 
		same. Each of us is accountable for our understanding of God's Word, and 
		we carry the responsibility of its interpretation. This lesson will 
		explore perhaps the most crucial principle in biblical interpretation: 
		context. We will examine what context means, how to effectively utilize 
		it, and why it is so vital to our understanding.
			
			In 
		our previous lesson, we examined a critical aspect of context: the 
		importance of understanding the Bible as a whole. It is our 
		responsibility to recognize the different divisions and ages within it. 
		We discussed the patriarchal period when God communicated directly with 
		the heads of families, providing them with specific instructions that 
		were not given to anyone else. For instance, He instructed Abraham and 
		Noah on unique tasks that were exclusively for them. This direct 
		communication continued for an extended period. Later, God provided a 
		distinct set of laws—known as the Law of Moses—specifically for the 
		Israelites, outlining what they were to do and what they were not to do. 
		However, it’s important to note that this law was ultimately rendered 
		obsolete with the crucifixion.
			
			We 
		revisit passages such as Ephesians 2 and Colossians 2, which state that 
		the law has been abolished and will never be reinstated. It is not a 
		matter of it being temporarily set aside; it has been permanently 
		fulfilled. Jesus embodied the essence of the Old Law, the Law of Moses, 
		and upon His arrival, He fulfilled its requirements. Consequently, it is 
		no longer part of what He expects from us.
			
			By 
		neglecting the overall context of the Bible, specifically the 
		relationships between its divisions, we have seen numerous 
		misinterpretations arise. This often occurs because individuals fail to 
		recognize these distinctions. It is our responsibility to address this 
		issue.
			
			This lesson will  focus primarily on what we refer to as the immediate 
		context.
			
			When engaged in conversation, one may hear someone quote a specific 
		verse from the Bible, asserting, "This is what it says," and while the 
		quote may be accurate, it is often taken out of context. Have you ever 
		approached a small group having a conversation and overheard something 
		that made you think, "What in the world?" This confusion arises from the 
		lack of contextual understanding. 
			
			You 
		might hear a sentence or phrase that could be interpreted negatively in 
		one scenario but could also have a completely harmless meaning in 
		another. If you missed the preceding dialogue, you may misunderstand the 
		entire conversation. The same principle applies to the Scriptures; 
		taking a verse out of its surrounding context can lead to significant 
		misinterpretations. 
			
			Thus, we will emphasize the importance of examining the verses 
		immediately before and after a particular passage.
			
			We 
		need to exercise caution regarding chapter divisions in the Bible. It’s 
		important to remember that these divisions were not placed there by God 
		but were added by humans many years later. The same applies to how 
		verses are divided. While chapter divisions can be helpful, there have 
		been instances where their placement has led to misunderstandings or 
		misinterpretations. It's essential to be aware of this when reading and 
		studying the text.
			
			Let's take a moment to examine Romans chapter 12. Specifically, let’s 
		look at verses 19 through 21. In this passage, Paul addresses the church 
		in Rome, saying, "Beloved, do not avenge yourselves, but rather give 
		place to wrath; for it is written, 'Vengeance is mine, I will repay,' 
		says the Lord." He continues, "Therefore, if your enemy is hungry, feed 
		him; if he is thirsty, give him a drink. For in doing so, you will heap 
		coals of fire on his head. Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil 
		with good."
			
			Often, we stop reading at this point and may conclude that capital 
		punishment or any form of discipline for lawbreakers is wrong. If we end 
		our reading here without considering the subsequent verses, we might 
		mistakenly believe that those who commit wrongdoings in our society 
		cannot be punished because God instructs us not to take vengeance. It's 
		important to look at the broader context to fully understand the message 
		being conveyed.
			
			What does he say in the very next verse? "Let every soul be subject to 
		the governing authorities, for there is no authority except from God, 
		and the authorities that exist are appointed by God. Therefore, whoever 
		resists authority resists the ordinance of God, and those who resist 
		will bring judgment upon themselves. For rulers are not a terror to good 
		works, but to evil. Do you want to be unafraid of the authority? Do what 
		is good, and you will receive praise from the same. For he is God's 
		minister to you for good, but if you do evil, be afraid, for he does not 
		bear the sword in vain." 
			
			Now, we understand what he is conveying: you are not meant to take 
		personal vengeance, for God has established governments to fulfill that 
		role. It is important to note that if we stopped reading at the end of 
		Romans chapter 12 and then began at the first four verses of Romans 13, 
		we would miss this crucial context, leading to misunderstanding. This 
		highlights the significance of considering immediate context.
			
			A 
		notable example can be found in Colossians chapter 2, verse 21, which 
		states: "Do not touch, do not taste, do not handle." Many people 
		interpret this to mean that there are certain things we should avoid and 
		others that are acceptable. However, the context actually suggests the 
		opposite. If you don't read the preceding verse or the one that follows, 
		you may misinterpret the message. Notice verse 20, which says, 
		"Therefore, if you died with Christ from the basic principles of the 
		world, why, as though living in the world, do you subject yourselves to 
		regulations?" The phrase "do not touch, do not taste, do not handle" 
		refers to things that pertain to the commandments and doctrines of 
		men—he's emphasizing the contrary point.
			
			In 
		examining the context of Colossians Chapter 2, Paul discusses the 
		various regulations outlined in the Law of Moses—what could be eaten, 
		what could not be eaten, what could be touched, and what should be 
		avoided. He emphasizes that these regulations are now obsolete, 
		questioning why people continue to adhere to the "do not touch, do not 
		taste, do not handle" rules. He highlights that they have been freed 
		from such limitations, affirming that it is entirely acceptable to 
		consume foods previously deemed unclean and to engage with things that 
		were once considered impure. This perspective is quite the opposite of 
		what many might assume. If one were to isolate that single verse without 
		considering the surrounding verses, it could lead to a completely 
		erroneous conclusion. This underscores the importance of context in 
		understanding Scripture accurately.
			
			Sometimes, we need to delve deeper than just the verse preceding or 
		following a particular scripture. It is crucial to consider a broader 
		context, and this is where a concordance becomes indispensable. For 
		instance, if we encounter a verse about repentance, to fully understand 
		what that entails, we must examine various other passages in the Bible 
		that discuss repentance. Relying on a single verse alone will not 
		provide us with a complete picture. Therefore, it is essential to 
		explore what is commonly referred to as the remote context—other verses 
		and sections of the Bible that address the same subject.
			
			 for instance let's look at first John chapter 3 verse 9 and remember if 
		we just take this one verse by itself and we don't pay any attention to 
		anything else that's written. first John chapter 3 verse 9 "whoever has 
		been born of God does not sin for his seed remains in him and he cannot 
		sin because he's been born of God."
			
			I 
		have encountered individuals and read various works suggesting that a 
		Christian cannot sin—that it is impossible for a Christian to sin. They 
		often base this belief solely on one particular verse. If that were the 
		only verse in the Bible, it might seem like a valid conclusion. However, 
		we must consider what other passages say on the matter. God holds us 
		responsible; we cannot take a single verse or a portion of a verse in 
		isolation and shape our lives around it. That’s why the entire Bible is 
		essential. We need to be diligent in our studies, as it takes effort, 
		time, and energy to cultivate a clear understanding of the truth.
			
			Let's examine 1 John 3:9, which states that a child of God cannot sin. 
		This has led many to question its meaning. To gain clarity, we should 
		also look at the first chapter of the same book. In 1 John 1:8, it says 
		that if we claim we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is 
		not in us. Verse 10 adds that if we say we have not sinned, we make God 
		a liar, and His word is not in us. 
			
			So, 
		which statement reflects the truth: can a child of God sin, or can they 
		not? Since we believe that the Holy Spirit is the author of this text, 
		we understand that both passages convey the same essential truth. John 
		opens his letter by stating that if you claim you don’t sin, you are 
		essentially lying. Therefore, can a child of God sin? Absolutely—there 
		is no doubt about it.
			
			In 
		1 John 3:9, what exactly is being conveyed? One way to understand this 
		is by looking at a similar phrase in the Old Testament. If we turn to 
		Genesis 44:22, we find an interesting example. In this passage, Joseph 
		is in Egypt, and Judah, along with his brothers, is recounting the story 
		of Benjamin, the youngest sibling. Judah states, "And we said to my 
		lord, 'The lad cannot leave his father, for if he should leave his 
		father, his father would die.'" 
			
			In 
		this context, the term "cannot" does not imply impossibility. Could the 
		lad leave his father? Certainly. Rather, "cannot" indicates that he 
		ought not to leave his father; it would be unwise for him to do so. 
		Physically, the lad could leave, but it is clear that he should not.
			
			
			This understanding also applies to 1 John 3:9. When it says that a child 
		of God cannot sin, it does not mean that sinning is impossible for them. 
		Instead, it signifies that a child of God should not sin—it is something 
		they ought to avoid. The idea is not that sinning is beyond their 
		capability, but rather that it should not characterize the life of a 
		child of God.
			
			We 
		might rephrase it in a contemporary context: Imagine a scenario where a 
		man of the world is walking down the street with a child of God. The man 
		suggests, "Let's go into this bar and have a drink." The child of God 
		replies, "No, I cannot do that. I am a child of God." This response 
		raises the question: what does he mean by saying he cannot do that? Is 
		it physically impossible for him to enter the bar and get a drink? No, 
		it’s not impossible; he could certainly do that. So when the child of 
		God says, "I cannot go in," what he really means is that he shouldn’t or 
		ought not to do so. It's simply not the right thing for him.
			
			By 
		examining the broader context within the Bible, we can better understand 
		1 John 3:9, which states that the child of God cannot sin. This means 
		that a child of God should not allow sin to be a habitual part of their 
		life; sin should not characterize their daily actions. However, it is 
		true that they can and do sin. If we claim otherwise, we are deceiving 
		ourselves and the truth is not in us. Therefore, it is clear that we do 
		sin. This understanding is reinforced by several passages throughout the 
		book of John, highlighting the importance of considering the remote 
		context.
			
			In 
		John chapters 14 through 17, a significant amount of dialogue occurs in 
		the upper room just before Jesus’ crucifixion and prior to his betrayal 
		in the garden by Judas. During this time, several important events take 
		place, including the institution of the Last Supper and the revelation 
		of Judas as the betrayer. Within these four chapters, Jesus makes 
		numerous promises specifically to the apostles. One key promise is that 
		the Holy Spirit, referred to as the Comforter, will come to them and 
		reveal all truth, ensuring they will not need to remember everything 
		themselves because the Holy Spirit will guide their words directly.
			
			It’s important to note that this context is directed solely at the 
		apostles. However, many people listening to radio and television 
		teachings often extend this claim to apply to themselves, asserting that 
		the Holy Spirit instructs them on what to say. I recall an account of 
		someone who once believed this principle in the religious community; he 
		waited for the Holy Spirit to guide him in delivering a message one 
		Sunday but ultimately received no direction. After that experience, he 
		decided not to adhere to the belief that the verse was applicable to 
		him.
			
			2 
		Timothy 2:15 instructs us to be diligent in rightly dividing the word of 
		truth, emphasizing the importance of effort and work. It does not imply 
		that we should simply wait for the Holy Spirit to miraculously provide 
		us with understanding about any given topic in the Bible.
			
			When examining passages such as John 14, John 15, and John 16, it's 
		important to note that some promises were specifically addressed to the 
		apostles. If you isolate one of these promises without considering the 
		surrounding context, you may arrive at a very misguided belief. Those 
		miraculous promises were intended for the apostles. 
			
			God 
		holds us accountable, just as He held the Jews of the first century 
		accountable for their lack of belief in Jesus. He declared that Moses 
		wrote about Jesus, making it clear that they were responsible for 
		recognizing the truth; it was presented in a way that was 
		understandable. While some people did come to believe, the majority did 
		not, despite the truth being accessible. 
			
			Today, we share that same responsibility to know what the Bible teaches 
		in order to be saved. The scriptures are not written in a cryptic 
		manner; they are straightforward and comprehensible. You don't need 
		years of study to grasp their meaning.
			
			God 
		expects us to believe in His Son and to commit our lives to Him. This 
		involves turning away from worldly things, repenting, and confessing His 
		name before others. The Bible clearly outlines these expectations—it’s 
		not complicated to understand. We also need to be born again, which 
		includes being immersed and buried for the forgiveness of our sins.
			
			
			God 
		holds us accountable for understanding biblical teachings and for 
		adhering to what is conveyed in 1 John 1, which emphasizes the necessity 
		of continually confessing our sins and seeking forgiveness. The Bible is 
		accessible, and we can certainly understand it.